Harvard and the Cost of Exclusion: What’s at Stake for Global Education
The Trump administration’s controversial campaign to restrict international student enrollment at Harvard has ignited a global academic firestorm, prompting fierce resistance, legal intervention, and widespread condemnation. Viewed by many as a reversal of decades of international academic cooperation, the policy has been framed as a response to national security concerns and domestic political pressures, but critics argue it is ideologically motivated and legally dubious.
The executive action, widely interpreted as a retaliatory strike against Harvard for its perceived opposition to the Trump administration, restricts visas for international students attending the university. Harvard and MIT responded swiftly, filing lawsuits challenging the legality and constitutionality of the ban. They allege it violates due process, academic freedom, and the First Amendment. Harvard President Alan Garber called it “a direct attack on the principle of intellectual openness,” adding, “We do not believe this action is lawful, and we will pursue every legal avenue to defend our students.”
Access the full article
Subscription
£149.99
£99.99
10 issues of essential data sent to your email, monthly.
One-time Purchase
£3.00
£3.00
A one-time payment unlocks lifetime access to this article.
Subscribe to read the full story.
The author made this story available to IEI members only.
If you're new to IEI, subscribe to read this story on us.
Already have an account? Sign in
